What does America want from Syria? Why does it hate Arab nationalism? (*) CIA Center for Arab Unity Studies.

The reader may ask about what connects what America wants from Syria with its Arab national hatred, and it may seem to some that there is no link between the two, but I see it as a close link, and even if Syria's adherence to Arab nationalism "and what it means from liberation dimensions and independence aspirations" may be a priorityReasons for the American position hostile to Syria.There is no doubt - of course - that there are other reasons "related to its geical goals and its project to dominate the world", but here I focus on this particular reason, because of its superior importance, and its association with other reasons, with the identity of Syria, its future and the aspirations of its people.

In my book, which was published in 2008 [1], I tried to warn against continuing to apply the recommendations and advice of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the European Union in transforming the Syrian economy towards the market economy and Labra, and explained that this means "as well as economic and social reasons" to weaken the state,And that weakening the state is an American and Western demand with the aim of swooping on Syria as a state and role, and thus removing it by establishing and implementing the new Middle East project, which the United States wants, in order to tighten its grip on our Arab region, and achieve the Zionist -American goals.

In a sub -title in the book, I asked a question about: Why focus on Syria? Syria referred to a battlefield, destruction and unprecedented killing, by virtue of the multiplicity of effective forces - local, regional and international - and by virtue of the complexity and intertwining of problems and the multiplicity of goals, means and mechanisms, and the overlapping and contradiction of interests. This war, and if it brought back to mind what Patrick Sel called the struggle over Syria, but added other dimensions related to the regional system and the international system, and the future of regional and international relations.

The evil dilemma, which Clinton talked about in her recently issued memoirs, is also because it is made and managed by the United States; Since the beginning of the events in Syria «March 2011), we have found the American ambassador,“ Ford ”, wandering between the demonstrators from Hama to Daraa and its countryside, as we found it moving between what the opposition spectra called, who were transferred by the United States into“ revolutionaries ”and then after they were armed with weapons "With its various names", moderate opposition, in an attempt to give "revolutionary" legitimacy to the terrorist factions that have been classified, funded and supplied with weapons, from multiple parties in the West led by the United States, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and others, with the aim of eliminating Syria as a state and tearing its people and cutting off its geography.

It is noted that the contribution of the United States to the war on Syria under the slogan of fighting terrorism was limited to flying and cultivating fixed bases "on the Syrian island" and in Ain al -Arab, as well as carrying out training and armament for what the "moderate opposition" called. Through its new strategy, the United States used its new tools of special forces and from intelligence means as well as drones, and modern means of communications and information that it developed at the disposal of its local customers, except for its use of journalism and media as a central means of broadcasting its toxins and creating the appropriate climates of its plans. The new American strategy is based on not directing its land military forces directly in external conflicts, after what these forces were exposed to in Afghanistan and Iraq, and now it is testing its new strategy in Syria, after it turned the Syrian crisis into an evil dilemma to make the war against Syria A sustainable situation, in its context, addresses its multidimensional problems, whether in the Arab region or in its relationship with Iran, Russia and currently with China with the aim of depleting the capabilities of these countries, without forgetting that in the sustainability of the war in Syria is a solution to its economic problems, the operation of weapons factories, oil revenues, and dumping The world is in renewed economic and social crises.

The crisis that the United States finally created, through the agreed truce, and its coup against the agreement signed between it and Russia, comes in the context of its general strategic goal by keeping the Syrian crisis open, continuing pressure on Syria in order to weaken it, and dumping Russia, Iran and the resistance, inA bottom swamp.

In this context, manipulation is taking place in the north of Syria, between Turkish delusions and the dreams of some Kurdish factions, in an exposed game, no less important with what is going on in southern Syria in the interest of the Zionist plan in finding a buffer zone between the occupied Golan and the liberated Golan, governed by terrorist armed factionsIt is sponsored by Israel and protects the United States.

From here, the dimensions of the American goals are clarified in what it wants to ignite the war in Syria and against it, as it is in addition to its support in supporting the terrorist factions, recently made a blatant aggression against the Syrian Arab forces in Deir Al -Zour (which is the second aggression of its type) with the aim of facilitating and supporting ISIS. In the entire occupation of Deir Al -Zour, the displacement of the remaining people of its people and the preparation for the separation of the western Euphrates from the east, which means preparing the conditions for the withdrawal of ISIS from Mosul to Raqqa, and the United States alongside this goal, looking at Deir Al -Zour, a special look related to its oil ambitions, after that A base for her in the oil "Rumailan" has established in collusion with some of the Kurds located in the illusion of establishing an independent entity for them on the Syrian island that made Deir Al -Zour a "oil and political" goal after it was confirmed that there is an important oil stock under the city, and the "dilemma" that the United States made For Syria and in Syria has a long history, and it may be useful to bring back to memory some of its stations. Perhaps in this we can revive the memory of those who forgot from the American "exploits" in the history of Syria, and perhaps we can also see what enhances the anti -American project:

The first station: It was the first point of contact with the American policy towards Syria, when the reconciliation conference was held «1919»; The American President was in support of the right to self -determination according to the principles he announced in 1918, so he stood alongside the Syrian demand expressed by Prince Faisal at that time, which is to send the investigation committee, with the intention of revealing English and French ambitions on the one hand, “in its presentation and the distribution of the region. Between the British and the French »and standing on the opinion of the people in Syria. On the other hand, the Europeans rejected this demand, while the United States agreed to it, and when the committee met the majority of the Syrians and their representatives, they expressed their desire that if there must be international assistance, then this assistance should be from the United States, provided that its help is limited to technical and economic matters. However, the committee's report was hidden in the corridors of the White House, and it was not announced, so the United States policy was exposed to Arab and Syrian public opinion in particular at that time, and the Arabs and Syrians who wagered on the United States were wounded with two siblings in two sites:

The first: When the Balfour Declaration supported the establishment of a national homeland for the Jews in Palestine, by a decision issued by the US Congress in 1922.

The second: When France supported its assignment to Syria, according to the French -American agreement, which is held on 4/4/1924.

From here we can understand the reasons for hiding and concealing the "King -Crane" report.The United States, accordingly, put itself alongside colonial Europe, and if its interests contradict the interests of Europe, which will be wider in a broader way and after the Second World War.

The false principles advocated by the American president have become clear, and the United States became a key partner in the state of the Arab nation in general or the Syrian situation in particular.She stood by traditional colonialism in the face of peoples when she placed themselves in the ranks of colonial states attacking the freedom of peoples and their rights.

Returning to the French -American agreement (1924), we find that this agreement has guaranteed the United States "respecting the royal rights that are for the French in the lands covered by the assignment" and made its citizens equal to the care of the delegated state in the privileges, and thus the United States has actually involved in attacking independence and freedom The Syrian people, who were seen as a supporter of the people and is trivial from colonial ambitions, so that, with their support for Zionism and French colonialism, losing the respect and confidence of the Syrian people, and became seen as any other aggressive country, despite its bragging with the principles of "Wilson", democracy and human rights. After that, her political practices came to prove the definitive evidence that she only works with the inspiration of its interests, which are width of the wall with the interests and rights of peoples.

The second station: It was after the Second World War, and that stage was distinguished by the escalation of the influence of the United States, as well as the influence and role of both Britain and France.After the victory scored by the Soviet Union in the war, the role and importance of the Soviet Union began to escalate on the international scene, especially when he stood alongside the people who look at independence and freedom in international forums, in supporting their independence and liberation from colonialism, and with its focus on rebuilding its economy and its success in manufacturingThe nuclear bomb has become a global pole that calculates its account in the face of American imperialism.

Syria has obtained its independence after a long struggle against French colonialism, and it began building its democratic political system, and the establishment of an independent economy, but the United States did not like it, and through its ambitions to secure oil transport lines across Syria, and its incompatibility with Syria's foreign policy (especially its hostility to Zionism It carried out the first military coup (1949), from which the military coups and political turmoil followed, especially after the Syrian political will met with the Egyptian revolution led by Gamal Abdel Nasser, and Syria's stand against the tripartite aggression (1956) and its joining with Egypt to the non -alignment countries, and the growing role of the Syrian street in Support the directions of Syria Arab nationalism.

The American "annoyance" of Syria's Arab policy, in its western alliances, and the escalation of the role of the Syrian street, appeared in its focus against "Israel" and against Western alliances, and against the United States policy expressed at that time with what is called "Eisenhower's vacuum" and its political adherencePositive neutrality and unitary directions.

In the era of the fifties of the twentieth century, which was characterized by the escalation of the trends of Syrian politics against the American imperialism and against Zionism and with Arab unity, and its adherence to Arab nationalism in this era, the United States' anti -Arab nationalism on the surface has emerged and is no longer hidden by its Arab nationalist hatred and the policy of non -alignment and its loyalty to the Arab reaction.

In her study of Syrian -American relations in the fifties, depending on the US State Department documents, Bonnie F.Soundarrs, a professor at more than one American university in the book of the United States and Arab Nationalism - Syrian Case, 1953-1960;To extract important results through the attempts of the United States "during the Cold War" annexing Syria to the circle of influence, and preventing the Soviet Union from expanding and reaching the sources of oil and warm water [3].

"Syria's strategic location on the borders of Israel and Turkey, NATO ally, and the passage of oil pipelines coming from the rich Iraqi fields in its lands to the Mediterranean Sea, highlighted Syria's importance for the United States, and the Soviet help of the Damascus government,In associated with the statements of Syrian leaders opposing the West and Israel, he feared and angered American officials. ”

Sandruz says that the American administration has spent most of its diplomatic energies in an attempt to change the "extremist" Syrian government and began its media and intelligence services and the countries loyal to it by promoting that the Syrian government is biased to the Soviet Union, and that Arab nationalism is loyal to communism. Sonders says that the Americans eventually hoped that they would provide the Syrians with economic help in an attempt to end the "Soviet control" of Syria, and when they failed to do so and Syria insisted on its independent approach and retaining its sovereignty, they moved to the "rough methods" and harsh rhetoric hostile to Syria and anti -Arab nationalism, in addition To the secret operations of the CIA in 1956 and 1957 against Syrian rule.

Soundarrs, from the US State Department documents, reported a report by the Chargé d'Affairs of the American Embassy in Damascus, in which he fears the establishment of an extremist Syrian state loyal to the Soviets, stressing that the leaders of the "socialist Baath" are determined to establish a national social state, expecting that Syria has sufficient power until it overthrew the kingSaud to establish a system similar to the Syrian regime, and then the same effort was repeated in Iraq and Lebanon.

In this regard, Soundarrs supplies the Syrian officials to repeat that Syria will not be subject to communist or Soviet control, and that it will not resort to attacking its Arab neighbors, and it supplies an important statement to the Syrian President Shukri al -Quwatli in Cairo, "reprimanding" American officials because of their lack of distinction between communism and Arab nationalism, and because they are They consider that any country that does not fully agree with American policies is, in their view, has joined the ranks of the Soviet Union. Likewise, a Syrian foreign minister’s statement at that time Salah Al -Bitar, who attacked the United States because of its mockery of Arab nationalism and the impartiality and its depiction, was supplied that this means biased to communism. Al -Bitar condemned some governments for its involvement in a global propaganda conspiracy in order to hit the independent Syria policy "what is similar today to yesterday." Sandruz says that Abdel Nasser also tried to dispel the American concerns. the West. Abdel Nasser suggested to the United States if it wants to reduce tension with Syria not to try to threaten it or isolate it by waving the sixth fleet, and said that Turkey should inevitably not threaten Syria at all.

However, American officials did not accept this, and Soundarrs reported a report of the Operations Coordination Council (7/8/1957) on the development of American policy in Syria, ended in declaring disappointment and pessimism of the United States, noting that Syria is "the most fateful of the Soviet influence " In the Middle East. "It seems that the principle of Eisenhower has not accepted Syria's drifting towards communism, as the most extreme elements in the Syrian political arena now control the House of Representatives, the government and the army, and this called the CIA to work to overthrow these extremists, to confirm the government And the "mild" Syrian army, through the Wayne operation on 14/8/1957, which is a coup process planned by three employees of the American embassy in Damascus that the Syrian government was able to reveal and announce, and the United States considered that the disclosure of this process seemed to American officials as a severe crisis and perhaps A fatal blow to the United States Center in Syria.

It can be said that this era in the history of Syria ended in the emergence of the sun of Arab nationalism and the overthrow of the American project, as it recovered the role of the masses of the people by delivering its representatives to the parliament and forming a progressive national national government.The cohesion between the people, the army and the government has emerged by rejecting the projects of colonial alliances, opposing the Zionist movement and upholding the Palestinian issue, standing in the face of Turkish crowds, and adhering to the policy of positive neutrality, then by announcing an Arab popular desire to achieve the Syrian -Egyptian unity, so it was the first unit between two Arab countries in the erathe talk.

All of this led with errors in the practices of the unity system to the success of the forces of imperialism, Arab reactionary and anti -unity forces to sign the greatest punishment in modern Arab history by achieving separation between Syria and Egypt.The forces of aggression were not satisfied with that. Rather, it imposed the second punishment in the 1967 aggression, as this cohesion between American imperialism and the Zionist and Arab reactionary movement emerged on public.

The third station: It is the stage of the attempt to rise that Egypt and Syria started in order to recover the Arab dignity, which was insulted by the 1967 defeat, in the slogan that Abdel Nasser raised, “What was taken by force is not recovered except by force.” Indeed, it was distinguished by the performance of the Syrian forces and the Egyptian forces in the 1973 war and between About a distinct willingness, will and craftsmanship, and this performance has achieved since the early hours of progress towards the restoration of the Golan and the Sinai, but the deviation of Sadat and the tricks of Kissinger, which can be considered the godfather of that stage, aborted the victory that was hoped for its achievement; The American effort has focused on withdrawing the possibility of using the oil weapon in the battle against the Zionist entity "and the West and the United States" and putting a deep wedge between the Arab countries by withdrawing Egypt to reconcile alone with that entity, and thus finishing the idea of ​​Arab national autism, and working to weaken Damascus "the heart of Arabism beating Abdel Nasser also called it, “and the relentless work to bring down Iraq and its fragmentation and prevent the establishment of a“ strong ”national state in it. Thus, the work of the West, Zionism and the United States in this era (the seventies, eighties and nineties of the twentieth century) focused on:

- He pushed Egypt to sign the solo reconciliation with the Zionist entity, "Camp David Treaty", isolate it, and prevent it from playing its historical role in a unified Arab homeland.

- Iraq and its army drained in the war with Iran and creating the atmosphere, to transform the trend from fighting Zionism to fighting Iran.

Weakening the Syrian state, and imposing unfair sanctions on it, after being accused of supporting terrorism.

Announcing alternatives, which can be achieved, eliminates the idea of Arabism and creates other projects or entities.

These alternatives were two projects aimed at eliminating the identity of the Arab region, formulating other identities that cancel historical and cultural links, and weave links of another kind that allows the presence of the Zionist entity in a new fabric and identity as well as the liquidation of the Palestinian issue, and these two projects are:

A - The new Middle East project presented by Shimon Perez in the mid -1990s under American auspices and support.

B - The European Partnership Project presented by the European Union.Both projects aim to cancel the Arab identity, and accept the existence of the Zionist entity through new economic, political and cultural relations, in which this entity has a major role and an alternative to Arab economic integration. It was promoted through economic conferences for the "Middle East and North Africa" for economic projects and programs that attach Arab economies "Individual »in the global economy in light of the categories of globalization and one global village.

Despite the failures that faced the march of these two projects, what was able to achieve is a lot of goals, the Middle East and North Africa conferences, European partnership meetings and the resulting agreements were an important means of planting "normalization" seeds with the Zionist entity, which was hidden from them and whatIt is announced, on the one hand, and an effective administration in order to weaken the attitudes of Arab integration on the other hand.

In addition to this, the two projects, "The New Middle East and European Partnership", were working to promote the transformation of the market economy, and push for the adoption of new liberal economic policies, and that is not for the sake of achieving purely economic goals, but also in order to weaken the state, and link it to the wheel of the capitalist economy Free, and directing the development process with goals that are not in line with the desire to achieve real, comprehensive and independent development by self -reliance, but rather aims to link Arab economies to the global economy, and make it dependent on this economy, it works through its mechanisms and heading abroad, and not to achieve the process of social, economic and cultural advancement Through an integrated development project with interactive Arab orientations.

The economy of the market and the new liberal economic policies, which have been widely and systematically spent, since the 1990s in light of the connections, directions, recommendations and advice Some part - it aims economically - to weaken the state's control over the economy, and distort the development process from its social goals, which led to the breadth of the circle of poverty, the breadth of the gap between the rich and the poor, the expansion of the atmosphere of corruption, unemployment and consumer culture, the increase in the size of the shadow economy, the spread of slums and the city's curves, All this atmosphere was "helping" to sow the seeds of what was later called the "Arab Spring".

All this comes by working to activate the "American Century Project";That project, which was established in 1997 to develop American foreign policy perceptions in the new century.

Here, we find it useful to remember the most important directions of this project, which is eager about its three recommendations:

1 - The need to significantly increase American military spending in order to assume the cosmic responsibility of the United States.

2 - The need to strengthen relations with the Democratic allies of the United States, and to confront the "hostile systems" of the interests and "values" of the United States.

3 - The need to accept responsibility, and the unique role of the United States in preserving an international system that protects "interests, well -being and principles" of the United States.

These trends reflect the practices of the United States and its external policies, especially with regard to confronting the anti -interests and values of their interests, and this means facing all that contradicts the American project in its aspirations to dominate the world and prejudice the international system that it wants to protect its interests, well -being and its "democratic" principles.

It is worth noting that the new [4] conservatives are the ones who formulated this project and who worked for its implementation. The events of September 2001 represented a turning point in the influence of the new conservative movement, which has escalated a lot and has become an essential tributary of the American foreign policy, as they succeeded in replacing the "communist danger" with the "threat of terrorism" that has become the main slogan of US foreign policy under the Bush administration yet September 11, 2001, and the new conservatives used this to serve their interests, strengthen their influence and implement their own agenda. It also states that this trend has a close relationship with weapons companies, oil companies and the business sector, and he succeeded in increasing defense expenses and thus weapons purchases, as he succeeded in reducing taxes on companies and the rich, and his political positions revealed a strong cohesion with the Zionist goals.

The fourth station: It is the stage of preparing the theater of the major transformations in the Arab region, in general and the theater of the "crime" committed against the Syrian people, in particular based on the American strategy, aimed at changing "hostile regimes", creating chaos and spreading the principles and values of the United States, by generalizing its "democratic approachAnd protecting the Zionist presence.

And if the United States has managed to destroy Iraq and dismantle its society and its army, then its Syrian obsession remains standing as long as Syria remains, its people remained united, and its army remained coherent.

The "American National Time Strategy" [5] was laid a year after the events of September 2001, and with the background of this strategy, a severe polarization was made at the international level, which was reduced by US President Bush Jr. with its meaning "either with or against America" ​​and the American administration was known To this basis, itself as a global policeman sorting the countries of the world and its peoples between a terrorist "or a supporter of terrorism" and a hostile to terrorism: good and evil - progress and backwardness, through the American -Western Zionist perspective. The rudimentary Arab regimes began seeking to appease the American, as they land them by giving them the green light for the continued adherence to the chair of government, and gave the name "moderate state" to the extent that it approached the American strategy and entered normalization with the Zionist entity - regardless of its practice towards its peoples.

Syria remained tall, proud of its assessment of its Arabism, its Zionist hostility, and its control of the American project, and for this the American strategy towards Syria was launched from the following foundations and principles:

- Continuing work to isolate Syria internationally.

Syria's surrounding Arabs in the countries of moderation and their pressure.

Weakening Syria internally.

Feeding fragile and weak "oppositions" with promises and support.

Declaration of the weapon of democracy, human rights and civil society.

- The Syrian economy is overthrown in the clutches of new economic liberalism.

Support the directions of the market economy and the opening of the markets.

- Attaching the Syrian economy to the global economy.

- Supporting advocates and elites of globalization, supporting their assumption of government responsibilities and was used to achieve this.

Political pressures and economic sanctions.

- Programs for the transformation towards the market economy provided by international institutions and the European Union.

- The "manufacture of an elite" is a globalization of academics and businessmen, who call for engaging in the global economy.

All of this comes through the American national security strategy, especially the fifth paragraph, which is considered a working guide for the American administration in the economic field, and this paragraph includes: “Work for a new era of economic growth at the global level, through the establishment of free markets and free trade.”

The American strategy has identified the economic principles of the United States and its economic role in promoting economic and economic growth outside America.It will use its economic cooperation with other countries for the benefits of economic policies by taking the following measures:

Establishing organizational and legal policies that drive growth and encourage investment, invention and contracting activity.

Adopting strong financial systems that allow the most effective use of capital.

Free trade that opens new prospects for growth and enhances the spread of technology and ideas.

This comes from the fact that "the market economies, not the economies of government control and control, are the best way to prosper and reduce poverty rates" as the American national security strategy.

The Bush project, "The Great and Wastening Middle East", included the same trends, although it comes more detailed, especially with regard to achieving democratic and economic reform.The European Partnership project also includes explicit texts on the shift towards the market economy, and "Washington's EFA" [6] is a detailed program to help the previous socialist countries and developing countries to turn towards the market economy.

After the occupation of Iraq (2003), the United States decided that it was time to blow up the foundations of Syrian policy and that time has become appropriate to pressure Syria to change its behavior, and to engage in the American project; She wanted to occupy Iraq to establish a democratic model that can be circulated to the countries of the region, and she wanted to start from Syria, so she adopted the policy of threat, promises and pressure in order for Syria to abandon support the Palestinian resistance and close its offices, as well as abandon the Lebanese resistance. It also wants to cut its relations with Iran, and to turn into joining what was called in moderate countries, that is, a country that goes into the American political passengers and accepts peace with "Israel" without restriction or condition.

On the other hand, Syria found that it is necessary and necessary to support the Iraqi resistance, work to thwart the occupation of Iraq, and continue to support and support the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance.

It became clear that the occupation of Iraq was taking place in the context of the implementation of the new Middle East project "or the large as Bush called him Jr..

On 3/5/2003, the "demands" of the United States officially from Syria, when Colin Powell attended its foreign minister to meet President al -Assad, and presented these demands as mentioned in the minutes of the session published by Sami Kulaib in his book [7].Powell confirmed that he is an official envoy by the President of the United States, and that the US President wanted him to "convey the problems that you suffer from, and let us exchange you, and to hear your response about what I said."

He sees (i.e. the American President) that there are two important elements who come according to the new strategic situation in the region, the first is the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime in a decisive way that forces everyone to pay attention to the results of that type of behavior .. and the other element that expresses the situation here is the fact that the government existsThe new Israeli (Netanyahu government), the transfer of the Palestinian Authority to Abu Mazen, the presence of the new government, and Muhammad Dahlan, the Ministry of State for Security Affairs.

It is clear that in Powell's talk a threat to Syria, including moving towards a "road map for peace" with "understanding" of the Syrian requirements "and concerns about the issue of the Golan", focusing on the American desire to end violence and eliminate terrorism, and from here comes the urgent American demand in an end to actionsThe Palestinian groups, "the Shiites and your existing in Syria, in Damascus, whether they are Hamas or other people here ... and I know that these offices must be closed."

"I think that the presence of these offices in Syria means that it is a red light not for Israel, but for the rest of the world, meaning that these offices do not reflect anything loved by Syria and affect Syria's reputation negatively."

That is why I ask you the President of the President to close these offices and tell their leaders to find another place to practice their activities in it, and this will be seen as a very positive signal from you not only in the region, but also in the United States. ”

"The other point I want to speak about," Powell says, "This point relates to Hezbollah ... and that Hezbollah's support is continuing by charging some materials to Hezbollah via Syria, and we want to ask you again to stop this type of activities."

Of course, President Bashar al -Assad rejected the demands of the United States, which was conveyed by US Secretary of State General Powell.

Through these four stations, the American position is rolled towards Syria, as it realizes the strategic location of Syria, its historical importance, and its center at the heart of calling for Arab nationalism in its humanitarian content, and its aspirations aspiring aspirations to establish a justice and development community from the beating "heart of Arabism", so it became understandable why the states focus United on Syria, and what do you want from it? It wants it a "moderate state" like the rest of the United States and to be able to support the issues of liberation in the world, and for this you want to weaken it as a state and eliminate its national orientations, and to stop calling for the issue of Palestine and support the resistance and accepting "surrender" to Israel, its leadership and its dominance in the Arab region Within the directions of American domination, and in the context the United States wants Syria to shift towards the market economy, engage in the global economy and join globalization; In this trend, weakening the power of the Syrian economy, and thus weakening the state, and then it is easy to accept to make concessions towards the requirements of the American strategy, and towards the Zionist entity.

In this context, we cannot separate what is going on at the internal level “especially the weakening of the Syrian economy and the spread of the atmosphere of corruption” and between the requirements of engaging in the Israeli and Zionist project, and the work to ignite internal sedition was an essential part of American policy, and the first steps in this regard.Creating contradictions within Syrian society and igniting the pre -nationalist "sectarian - sectarian - ethnic" tendencies, and that this is covered with political demands related to democracy and human rights.

This plan has helped that the liberal economic policies recommended by the international institutions and the European Union, which have become a listening ears within the administrative and bureaucratic apparatus, and in the academic atmosphere and the atmosphere of businessmen, these policies began to reap their results combined with the expansion of the paragraph circle and the breadth of the gap in incomes and unemployment, Where all of this is covered with the rise of the new class of businessmen, corrupt and spoilers at the expense of the middle class and those with limited income and the poor, and this is the appropriate climate for the widening circle He began to sweep the Syrian geography, with the decline of political demands and the decline of the role of the national opposition, after some of them were involved under the banner of external trends and regional and international projects and turned into "wages" of the plans drawn abroad, while others retreated and absent in the world of forgetfulness after the events exceeded it.

In this atmosphere, the role of terrorist organizations that sought to persist in weakening the state and its criminal practices was escalated, we see that meeting between them and the Zionist demands, for example the question arises about the direction of some armed factions to destroy the bases of Syrian missiles and anti -aircraft artillery; This criminal act is certainly in the interest of Israel, and this is more broader in dispersing the efforts of the Syrian armed forces along the Syrian geography and hitting its basic structures, as well as expanding the operations of economic sabotage and the destruction of state institutions that are the king of the entire Syrian people, and then came the sabotage of railways Energy and infrastructure institutions, destroy housing houses, and displace citizens to confirm an Israeli desire to punish the Syrian people for their audacity in the face of the American -Zionist -Western project and their loyalty Arab issues, foremost of which is the Palestinian issue.

Arab nationalism "which is the Arab national project", the American -Western Zionist project opposes; This is because its advanced humanitarian liberal content contradicts the American domination, Zionist fascism and Western aspirations with a black history in the narrative of Arab liberation in the twentieth century - and here the events of this American project meet with the political Islam project in its Wahhabi Takfiri version, this fascist obscurant project is directed to the depth of Arab societies In order to destroy it, break it up, and return it to the ages of ignorance and darkness, and this is what the American and Western Zionist project wants, so they allied together against Arab nationalism and against Syria and the means of liberation and Arab national orientation, regional role and international position a supporter of the liberation forces in the world.

You may also be interested in the Trump administration of US foreign policy in the Middle East

#Center of Arab Unity Studies #American Foreign Policy_ in the Middle East #United States #Syria #American Politics in Syria #The role of the United States in the Syrian crisis