The hadith of Muhammad bin Salman and the response of the Brotherhood.. The truth and the historical lie

The Muslim Brotherhood claims that the group's history is "a witness to the confrontation of takfir and extremism," and calls for "direct dialogue" to "express the truth of its positions in word and deed."

This Brotherhood claim, which contradicts the facts and facts of matters and history, was put forward by the terrorist organization in response in an “official statement” to the statements of Prince Muhammad bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, the Saudi Crown Prince, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, yesterday, to “The Atlantic” newspaper. Which the organization said was a "surprise" to it!

Prince Muhammad bin Salman confirmed, in statements to the American newspaper yesterday, that "the Brotherhood plays a huge and huge role in creating all this extremism, and some of them are considered as a bridge that leads you to extremism, and when you talk to them, they do not appear as if they are extremists, but they take you to extremism."

In the organization's statement, Osama Suleiman, the official spokesman for the Brotherhood (Ibrahim Mounir Front), claimed that "it has been proven historically that the Brotherhood is a moderate group that has always stood against terrorism, takfir and extremism."

And he continued, "(The group) played a prominent role in preserving the capabilities of peoples, and protecting societies and youth from extremism and extremism, even in the darkest moments it went through, and this is evidenced by its confrontation with the takfir sedition since the sixties."

Mounir Front's statement was not satisfied with this, but rather stressed the group's readiness for direct dialogue, and said, "With its total rejection of every deviation from the true religion, the Brotherhood will remain ready for direct dialogue and remove fears until everyone becomes clear about the truth of its positions in word and deed."

However, the terrorist organization did not explain in its statement how it would work to remove what it recognized as "fears" about the Brotherhood.

The history on which the terrorist organization relies to indicate its peacefulness and its disavowal of committing violence, itself bears witness to many facts on the Brotherhood’s practice of violence and terrorism and incitement to it.

Two Faces of the Brotherhood

Hisham al-Najjar, an expert in the affairs of political Islam movements, said in an exclusive interview with "Al-Ain News", that "the Brotherhood has had two sides throughout its history. And political deception that does not reflect the reality of its exclusionary takfiri approach, which spawned all takfiri and terrorist groups on the scene.

Al-Najjar emphasized that "the Brotherhood is the most dangerous group ever compared to terrorist organizations such as ISIS and Al-Qaeda, because it deliberately hides its violent takfiri approach under soft political discourse and practices of gradual and gradual penetration into societies and bodies so that it can dominate the joints of the state, and reach its final goal, which is unilateralism." with authority.”

He went on to say, "The opposite of ISIS, as an example, which does not begin with these maneuvers and deceptions, but rather applies methods of violence and expiation openly from the first moment without equivocation."

He also highlighted that "the Brotherhood employs all other violent and takfir groups for its own benefit, and is considered as its military wing to control its opponents and competitors."

He explained, "The group has a declared political arm that deceives the community with which Al-Banna (Hassan Al-Banna, the founder of the organization) called the exhibition, in addition to a secret military wing that he called the Workshop."

Based on this, the Egyptian political expert believes that Ibrahim Munir's statement seeks to activate the mechanisms of deception that the Brotherhood follows, and maneuvers with the arm of the political group in an attempt to return it to the political scene in the Arab region, hiding the secret wings and all the disasters of violence and terrorism that the group committed and is committing around the world.

An open maneuver

It is noteworthy that the Brotherhood, which was founded in 1928, is considered the most prominent terrorist organization that hides behind religion in the modern era, and has a network of organizations and associations around the world.

Al-Najjar attributed Munir's talk about "readiness for direct dialogue" to "attempts to wash the reputation on the one hand, and the Munir front to establish itself as a front that leads the group while seeking to marginalize Mahmoud Hussein's opposition front on the other hand."

The head of the Brotherhood organization has been striking for many months, a sharp division between the front of Ibrahim Munir, the acting general guide, residing in London, and the front of Mahmoud Hussein, the former Secretary General of the group (Istanbul), both fronts fighting over money, power and influence.

In turn, Ahmed Ban, an expert in the affairs of political Islam movements, said in an exclusive interview with "Al-Ain News" that the "Mounir Front" realizes that the break with Saudi Arabia after Egypt means the end of the group, and it means very much that it draws closer to Saudi Arabia.

He warned that "the Brotherhood seems ready for direct dialogue for the sake of failed attempts to dispel Riyadh's fears."

A long history of violence

Whoever follows the Brotherhood movement since its founding in the late 1920s to the present day sees that violence is an integral part of the organization's strategy to reach power, and what may change is the form of this violence. The practitioner towards the opponents of the group approach.

For more than 9 decades, the life of the terrorist group, its history in Egypt was not devoid of crimes and terrorism, which reached its climax in the aftermath of the June 30, 2013 revolution.

The group carried out massive assassinations that horrified the Egyptians and shook security and stability in the country, and the facts of their biggest crimes in the forties date back to March 22, 1948, when the Brotherhood assigned Abd al-Rahman al-Sanad, head of the secret apparatus, to two of the Brotherhood, Hassan Abdel Hafez and Mahmoud Zainhum. The mission of assassinating Judge Ahmed Al-Khazindar, who was looking into cases of terrorist operations and the bombing of cinemas, for which Brotherhood elements were convicted.

Al-Khazindar was not the only one to be hit by the Brotherhood's bullets, but also the Prime Minister of Egypt, Mahmoud Fahmy al-Naqrashi, as he was targeted 20 days after his historic decision to dissolve the Brotherhood in all its branches in the country and confiscate its money and property, and arrest the group's symbols on December 8 The first was 1948, in a clear indication that violence is the group's only means of confronting opponents.

The terrorist organization has sought for decades to push the country into chaos and has practiced many forms of violence in order to achieve its goals and reach power.

From the "Mansheya Incident" in 1954 during the rule of the late President Gamal Abdel Nasser to the failed coup attempt against the late President Muhammad Anwar Sadat in April 1974, known as the "military art".

In the 1990s, the terrorist organization did not condemn the violence that was raging between security and extremist groups at the time, but rather went beyond helping these groups to continue confronting the state and its security forces.

Modern Tour

With the escalation of protests in the country in early 2011, the Brotherhood's violence grew, beginning with storming prisons, attacking departments, and demolishing churches, in addition to the riots perpetrated by the organization's elements against the security forces and opponents of their satanic ideology.

Egyptians do not forget the bloody events in front of the Ittihadiya Palace, east of Cairo, which were committed by the terrorist organization on the afternoon of December 4, 2012, and continued until the dawn of the next day.

Including the Rabaa and Al-Nahda sit-ins in the summer of 2013, storing weapons, and then confronting security and attempts to sow chaos in the country through military wings formed by the organization, most notably “Hasm”, “Brigade of the Revolution”, and “Revolutionary Punishment”, which declared itself after 2013.

Although the terrorist Brotherhood operates as a political organization, it is intertwined in its ideology and movements on the ground with terrorist organizations from ISIS to Al-Qaeda.

Sameh Ismail, an expert in the affairs of Islamic movements, said in a previous interview with "Al-Ain News", that "the Brotherhood tried to form an ideological discourse that employs all the facts of the current situation in favor of the organization by forming a solid bloc at the grassroots level, through a shortened religious discourse, The text is employed according to a political dimension in favor of the group, while addressing the political elites at home and abroad with a more flexible discourse.