Hussein Al-Sheikh is not alone in the face of Israeli disinformation

pens and opinions

Written by: Nasser Damj

I have been following the Israeli media for many years, and I know many Israeli journalists who follow the Palestinian issue in person. I claim that I am aware of the motives and methods of their work, and how they build their reports and weave their misleading narratives about the Palestinian situation, in order to serve the goals and the higher political goals of their state, within a mighty lying and blinding machine; and provided with the necessary financial resources and Palestinian informants, who decided to work for free for the benefit of that machine without knowledge or good judgment of the consequences; This is a standard rule suitable for dealing with the Israeli occupier, and everything that expresses its presence on our land. Against this background, it is possible to assess the excessive focus of some Israeli journalists on the person of the Fatah Central Committee member “Hussein Al-Sheikh”, after his election by the Palestinian Central Council, as a member In the Executive Committee of the Liberation Organization, and much earlier. On February 20, 2022 AD, the 13th Israeli channel broadcast a report filled with hatred and prejudice against the man, prepared and presented by the Israeli journalist “Zvi Yehezkili,” an Arab journalist; He previously served in the undercover unit in the Israeli occupation army. He is also a devout Jew. He is openly hostile to everything that is Arab, Palestinian and Muslim. He is known to be a distinguished preparer of failed reports, in terms of the failure of his ironic report on the inciting role of mosques in the occupied Palestinian interior on July 15. 2015 AD, and how he tried to link them all to ISIS, and tried to market it to Western public opinion, but he failed miserably, and turned to the mockery of Israeli journalists. Expressing his concern for the interests of the Palestinian people, which the sheikh could squander, while it is a task undertaken by his occupying state for our land and our people. His report for the general knowledge of the Palestinian people about it, because the “Sheikh” is the son of a family that enjoys goodness in its diversity and breadth from before his birth, and this is a fact that has a well-established and wide-ranging societal birth certificate, and that the Sheikh’s grandfathers practiced free trade, and that trade was not made by the Sheikh for himself, but rather for himself. This is about the founding fathers of the family’s profession. Those who knew “Hussein al-Sheikh” inside and outside Israeli families testify to him of his good conduct, the cleanliness of his hand, his numerous contributions to the general struggle effort, and his endurance of wide sections of the workload, when the resources were depleted and the capabilities of the organization were scarce. Israel looks at Hussein al-Sheikh as it looks at Abu Mazen The Israeli occupier's view of Hussein al-Sheikh is similar to their view of Abu Mazen, who liked his liberal political discourse, compared to the speech of the late Yasser Arafat, but he suddenly became a diplomatic terrorist, after his stubborn adherence to Palestinian rights, whose justice society agrees to. And Hussein al-Sheikh, who spent the last two decades of his official work, charged by the Palestinian leadership with managing contact with Israel, the occupying power itself did not show any sign of alarm from him, in terms of its high concern for the interests of our people, and its warning to it through its paid journalists of the existence of this The danger. In the Sheikh’s vision of political action, the problem lies before and after the Sheikh’s interview with the Saudi Al-Sharq channel on February 15, 2022 AD, he was able to present his vision for work, as a potential negotiator for the Israelis, instead of the forgiven Saeb Erekat, who stressed his adherence to international legitimacy as a fair arbitration platform between the Palestinians and Israelis. Which, I think, caused the occupying state to annoy the most. Because this adherence to the Palestinian clinging to the demand of the Israeli withdrawal from all the Arab lands occupied in 1967 AD, including the departure of the settlers, in the sense that the sheikh gave priority to withdrawal over other conflict files; As it deals with the founding file of the conflict, i.e. pouring effort on how to get rid of the military occupation and erase everything that resulted from its existence. He also successfully demonstrated the complementary relationship between supporting the steadfastness of the population and their steadfastness in their land and preventing their emigration, as a measure preventing the voluntary catastrophe, resulting from the reluctance of young men and women About sticking to the homeland, because of life’s difficulties and hardships, and this, in my opinion, rises to the level of the plan, meaning that the successful resistance to the occupier is the result of people being able to hold out in their homes for the longest possible period of time, which the sheikh described as the demographic factor. And it is he who worries (Israel) From her point of view, it constitutes an insult to the integration of the passages of the Israeli independence dream, which means the imposition of control over the entire historical Palestine, devoid of any Arab. Which did not please the Israelis at all, because their vision of the future relationship with our people is not consistent with this vision, because it manages a completely different matter, which the Sheikh cannot be a partner in; Because it is based on continuing the process of existential liquidation of our people, moving forward with the confiscation of lands and building settlements, dividing the homes into separate geographical units from each other, canceling the role of the authority in its sovereign form, and replacing it with separate clan authorities but linked to the Israeli occupier. The urban Greeks, appointing new leaders from family backgrounds and others based on their cooperation with the occupier's projects and supporters. In order for the original things to remain as they are; Other things must change. Perhaps the sheikh, from his overlooking position, deduced this fact in order to seek different and new results for the negotiating process, which does not allow after today to continue working by the same means, and expect different results at the end of the season. For this reason, the Sheikh believes that the rule must be reset. governing the relationship with the occupier; Including its resistance and negotiation, which are methods of dealing that set its international legal standards and rules, including the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions, and the wide range of United Nations resolutions and international law, as the only references for the relationship between the occupying state and the occupied peoples. That the new era of negotiation must be different from the previous era, which caused wasting many of the gains that could have been obtained, not allowing the division of the conflict file, and continuing negotiations with the Israeli occupier, within his (he) vision, which is based on the fragmentation of the main conflict file, and industry Dozens of parallel files as an alternative to the withdrawal file, as this equation turned upside down the mechanism of the Palestinians’ handling of the negotiations, i.e. the issues that follow the withdrawal were talked about before the withdrawal itself took place, and this made it difficult to agree on any topic, no matter how small, after the passage of 25 A year after the signing of the Declaration of Principles Agreement. Because that fragmentation caused the Palestinian negotiators to be distracted, and it canceled the conditional negotiations on the withdrawal from the occupied territories as a founding issue of the conflict, and capable of settling it as well. Therefore, the new era of negotiation with the Israeli occupier, according to the same vision, must be preceded by the delineation of a new Palestinian negotiation strategy, rich in in-depth conclusions from the experience of previous negotiations, including: - A- Adopting international legitimacy resolutions as a single package, as the sole reference for the negotiation process with The Israeli occupier, foremost of which are the United Nations resolutions in particular and the 30 resolutions issued by the United Nations Security Council since 1967 AD, all of which require Israel to fully comply with the resolutions of international legitimacy, the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions and to put an end to the last occupation in history. B- That is why the Sheikh is certain, That the new negotiation strategy must be adopted, on the basis of the Israeli occupation state’s demand for a complete withdrawal from the Palestinian Arab lands occupied in 1967 AD, and leaving the rest of the files as a result of the withdrawal, such as the settlement and wall files. What is on it, and what is in it, after that you decide the fate of what colonialism left over it or inside it. W- Embracing this trend in negotiation, from the sheikh’s point of view, means that we improve what you gave us International legitimacy, such as Israel’s call for withdrawal and non-recognition of any of its policies and measures taken in the occupied Arab lands after 1967 AD, and the resolutions of international legitimacy in our Palestinian case have the force of a gun if they are associated with negotiation. Constructive transformations in the American interior towards the Palestinian issue, within the broadening of the global public support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Modernization, during the Palestinian-Israeli confrontations in the squares of Al-Aqsa Mosque and Sheikh Jarrah, and the outbreak of a comprehensive confrontation between them in May 2021 AD, which enabled a new generation of neo-liberals in the Republican and Democratic parties to take the initiative, escalate their moral attack against the Israeli occupation state, and review standards global standards to measure the degree to which the parties are not making mistakes; And examining the extent of their compliance with international law or not, and prosecuting them on this basis. H- This means that the Palestinians are required to continue building on the similar transformation in the European Union countries, taking into account that the new generations of European peoples are those who were born after the end of the Cold War , unlike their ancestors who suffered from the complex of compensating the Jews for the harm inflicted on them by the Nazi beast, and these generations do not care about the (Zionist) shackle, and are determined to break from it; She became free in her way of thinking, and how to get out of the box of stereotypical European and American thinking towards the Jews, and the fear of repeating the hateful racist Holocaust; What made it more receptive to the alternative narrative, addressing the mind and consistent with the logic of things, history and international law. I believe that the sheikh is convinced that changing the Palestinian negotiation strategy will contribute to changing the mechanism of action of the international community, which is adapted to the current situation in the occupied Arab territories, and theoretically supports the two-state solution that It was effectively dispelled by the intensive Israeli settlement project, which led to prolonging the illusion about the two-state solution, and the sustainability of the racist occupation. The Palestinian people are convinced not to accept negotiations on Jerusalem as an independent file, and to dive into misleading suggestions, such as the exchange of lands and the administrative capital in Abu Dis and other malicious proposals. , in a difficult and complicated cycle of selling and leaking lands and real estate and the right of the existing state to dispose of the princely lands, which will end in a solution and He compromised with him, including accepting the idea of ​​exchanging lands around Jerusalem, meaning that you will give the occupier the legitimacy to own dozens of settlements. And he is determined not to accept any idea that leads to improving living conditions under occupation and confusing living gains with higher political gains, because the Israeli occupation state is an occupying power. The military is racist and ill-intentioned, so the goal of ending the occupation must be fully and comprehensively adhered to within any new negotiation rounds.

Leave a comment

your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *